Deep SSL/TLS Vulnerability Test

This report provides a deep analysis of the SSL/TLS configuration of web.tolstoycomments.com. It checks for protocol support, cipher strength, and known vulnerabilities.

Scan Results

 Start 2026-05-30 04:27:30        -->> 95.129.232.112:443 (web.tolstoycomments.com) <<--

 rDNS (95.129.232.112):  ddos-guard.net.
 Service detected:       HTTP

 Testing for server implementation bugs 

 No bugs found.

 Testing HTTP header response @ "/" 

 HTTP Status Code             301 Moved Permanently, redirecting to "https://tolstoycomments.com/"
 HTTP clock skew              -1 sec from localtime
 IPv4 address in header       Set-Cookie: __ddg9_=136.124.34.61; Domain=.tolstoycomments.com; Path=/; Expires=Sat, 30-May-2026 04:48:01 GMT
                              (check if it's your IP address or e.g. a cluster IP)
 Strict Transport Security    not offered
 Public Key Pinning           --
 Server banner                ddos-guard
 Application banner           --
 Cookie(s)                    4 issued: NONE secure, 1/4 HttpOnly -- maybe better try target URL of 30x
 Security headers             Content-Security-Policy:
                                upgrade-insecure-requests;
                              Cache-Control: private
 Reverse Proxy banner         --


 Testing vulnerabilities 

 Secure Renegotiation (RFC 5746)           supported (OK)
 Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation     VULNERABLE (NOT ok), DoS threat (10 attempts)
 CRIME, TLS (CVE-2012-4929)                not vulnerable (OK)
 BREACH (CVE-2013-3587)                    potentially NOT ok, "br gzip deflate" HTTP compression detected. - only supplied "/" tested
                                           Can be ignored for static pages or if no secrets in the page
 POODLE, SSL (CVE-2014-3566)               not vulnerable (OK)
 TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV (RFC 7507)              Downgrade attack prevention supported (OK)
 SWEET32 (CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6329)    not vulnerable (OK)
 FREAK (CVE-2015-0204)                     not vulnerable (OK)
 DROWN (CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-0703)      not vulnerable on this host and port (OK)
                                           make sure you don't use this certificate elsewhere with SSLv2 enabled services, see
                                           https://search.censys.io/search?resource=hosts&virtual_hosts=INCLUDE&q=401EC95EB19CC46A2BC03BA7FFEBCC01FF394CC0A4BF537C4DF62E41E1C9BC0C
 LOGJAM (CVE-2015-4000), experimental      not vulnerable (OK): no DH EXPORT ciphers, no common prime detected
 BEAST (CVE-2011-3389)                     TLS1: ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
                                                 DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA
                                                 DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA
                                                 ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA
                                                 DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA
                                                 DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA128-SHA
                                                 AES256-SHA CAMELLIA256-SHA
                                                 AES128-SHA CAMELLIA128-SHA 
                                           VULNERABLE -- but also supports higher protocols  TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 (likely mitigated)
 LUCKY13 (CVE-2013-0169), experimental     potentially VULNERABLE, uses obsolete cipher block chaining ciphers with TLS, see server prefs.
 Winshock (CVE-2014-6321), experimental    not vulnerable (OK)
 RC4 (CVE-2013-2566, CVE-2015-2808)        no RC4 ciphers detected (OK)


 Done 2026-05-30 04:28:34 [  74s] -->> 95.129.232.112:443 (web.tolstoycomments.com) <<--


About this Scan

This scan uses testssl.sh to check for:

  • Protocols: SSLv2, SSLv3, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3
  • Vulnerabilities: Heartbleed, POODLE, FREAK, Logjam, DROWN, etc.
  • Cipher Suites: Weak ciphers, perfect forward secrecy (PFS) support.

Run Another Scan Recent Scans