Deep SSL/TLS Vulnerability Test
This report provides a deep analysis of the SSL/TLS configuration of sc02.alicdn.com. It checks for protocol support, cipher strength, and known vulnerabilities.
Scan Results
Start 2026-03-31 20:53:58 -->> 3.169.150.97:443 (sc02.alicdn.com) <<-- Further IP addresses: 2600:9000:2852:800:1f:c31e:7855:8b21 2600:9000:2852:7200:1f:c31e:7855:8b21 2600:9000:2852:d800:1f:c31e:7855:8b21 2600:9000:2852:200:1f:c31e:7855:8b21 2600:9000:2852:e800:1f:c31e:7855:8b21 2600:9000:2852:e600:1f:c31e:7855:8b21 2600:9000:2852:7000:1f:c31e:7855:8b21 2600:9000:2852:1a00:1f:c31e:7855:8b21 rDNS (3.169.150.97): server-3-169-150-97.ord58.r.cloudfront.net. Service detected: HTTP Testing for server implementation bugs No bugs found. Testing HTTP header response @ "/" HTTP Status Code 200 OK HTTP clock skew -1 sec from localtime HTTP Age (RFC 7234) 0 Strict Transport Security misconfiguration: \'0\' is not a valid max-age specification, just this domain Public Key Pinning -- Server banner Tengine Application banner -- Cookie(s) (none issued at "/") Security headers Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * Cache-Control: max-age=1 Reverse Proxy banner Via: ens-cache2.l2us3[0,0,200-0,H], ens-cache14.l2us3[0,0], ens-cache7.us26[0,0,200-0,H], ens-cache5.us26[2,0], 1.1 559b3a4485da4956f920208eb21d7a40.cloudfront.net (CloudFront) X-Cache: Miss from cloudfront Testing vulnerabilities Secure Renegotiation (RFC 5746) supported (OK) Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation not vulnerable (OK) CRIME, TLS (CVE-2012-4929) not vulnerable (OK) BREACH (CVE-2013-3587) no gzip/deflate/compress/br HTTP compression (OK) - only supplied "/" tested POODLE, SSL (CVE-2014-3566) not vulnerable (OK) TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV (RFC 7507) some unexpected "handshake failure" instead of "inappropriate fallback" SWEET32 (CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6329) VULNERABLE, uses 64 bit block ciphers FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) not vulnerable (OK) DROWN (CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-0703) not vulnerable on this host and port (OK) make sure you don't use this certificate elsewhere with SSLv2 enabled services, see https://search.censys.io/search?resource=hosts&virtual_hosts=INCLUDE&q=C4CEE1A75D5791ADF0B23D8B194EB25BDF149128EA373C0FFD04AFB27F32FF47 LOGJAM (CVE-2015-4000), experimental not vulnerable (OK): no DH EXPORT ciphers, no DH key detected with <= TLS 1.2 BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) TLS1: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES256-SHA AES128-SHA DES-CBC3-SHA VULNERABLE -- but also supports higher protocols TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 (likely mitigated) LUCKY13 (CVE-2013-0169), experimental potentially VULNERABLE, uses obsolete cipher block chaining ciphers with TLS, see server prefs. Winshock (CVE-2014-6321), experimental not vulnerable (OK) RC4 (CVE-2013-2566, CVE-2015-2808) no RC4 ciphers detected (OK) Done 2026-03-31 20:55:34 [ 106s] -->> 3.169.150.97:443 (sc02.alicdn.com) <<--
About this Scan
This scan uses testssl.sh to check for:
- Protocols: SSLv2, SSLv3, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3
- Vulnerabilities: Heartbleed, POODLE, FREAK, Logjam, DROWN, etc.
- Cipher Suites: Weak ciphers, perfect forward secrecy (PFS) support.