Deep SSL/TLS Vulnerability Test
This report provides a deep analysis of the SSL/TLS configuration of api.searchiq.co. It checks for protocol support, cipher strength, and known vulnerabilities.
Scan Results
Testing all IP addresses (port 443): 104.21.89.150 172.67.161.38 ----------------------------------------------------- Start 2026-05-20 22:25:31 -->> 104.21.89.150:443 (api.searchiq.co) <<-- Further IP addresses: 172.67.161.38 2606:4700:3032::ac43:a126 2606:4700:3030::6815:5996 rDNS (104.21.89.150): -- Service detected: HTTP Testing for server implementation bugs No bugs found. Testing HTTP header response @ "/" HTTP Status Code 200 OK HTTP clock skew 0 sec from localtime IPv4 address in header set-cookie: __cf_bm=Uvyn074cysxNqUqSiwh3zxDvZB_k7os6YHxeUeZs9lM-1779315960.0823243-1.0.1.1-R7NmkcQujvbMlT1vATU3.gv8Gv2EVGjmBu4uDUc98mYCHDyf3C_bMWxoZfTVb8qKw2XVE1CwY18GNE.gftfA8QMZktWtwUudhfN95pGZPtq0qOVlrX1HdEdd0YTAp0QJ; HttpOnly; SameSite=None; Secure; Path=/; Domain=searchiq.co; Expires=Wed, 20 May 2026 22:56:00 GMT (check if it's your IP address or e.g. a cluster IP) Strict Transport Security not offered Public Key Pinning -- Server banner cloudflare Application banner -- Cookie(s) 1 issued: 1/1 secure, 1/1 HttpOnly Security headers Cache-Control: public, max-age=5270400 Reverse Proxy banner -- Testing vulnerabilities Secure Renegotiation (RFC 5746) supported (OK) Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation not vulnerable (OK) CRIME, TLS (CVE-2012-4929) not vulnerable (OK) BREACH (CVE-2013-3587) potentially NOT ok, "br gzip" HTTP compression detected. - only supplied "/" tested Can be ignored for static pages or if no secrets in the page POODLE, SSL (CVE-2014-3566) not vulnerable (OK) TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV (RFC 7507) Downgrade attack prevention supported (OK) SWEET32 (CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6329) VULNERABLE, uses 64 bit block ciphers FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) not vulnerable (OK) DROWN (CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-0703) not vulnerable on this host and port (OK) make sure you don't use this certificate elsewhere with SSLv2 enabled services, see https://search.censys.io/search?resource=hosts&virtual_hosts=INCLUDE&q=EB64B0F7BEB363D59B05C466FE5F4D6D89F5EDB88FA35353C4FF1DD716FA7DAD LOGJAM (CVE-2015-4000), experimental not vulnerable (OK): no DH EXPORT ciphers, no DH key detected with <= TLS 1.2 BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) TLS1: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA AES128-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES256-SHA DES-CBC3-SHA VULNERABLE -- but also supports higher protocols TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 (likely mitigated) LUCKY13 (CVE-2013-0169), experimental potentially VULNERABLE, uses obsolete cipher block chaining ciphers with TLS, see server prefs. Winshock (CVE-2014-6321), experimental not vulnerable (OK) RC4 (CVE-2013-2566, CVE-2015-2808) no RC4 ciphers detected (OK) Done 2026-05-20 22:26:22 [ 61s] -->> 104.21.89.150:443 (api.searchiq.co) <<-- ----------------------------------------------------- Start 2026-05-20 22:26:22 -->> 172.67.161.38:443 (api.searchiq.co) <<-- Further IP addresses: 104.21.89.150 2606:4700:3032::ac43:a126 2606:4700:3030::6815:5996 rDNS (172.67.161.38): -- Service detected: HTTP Testing for server implementation bugs No bugs found. Testing HTTP header response @ "/" HTTP Status Code 200 OK HTTP clock skew 0 sec from localtime IPv4 address in header set-cookie: __cf_bm=XnnRh0OL9bQ09kkwLsbxdShRmWru934EH25feNzFSyk-1779316018.0920472-1.0.1.1-mCb0l0PRRNzcg.0zWlPZx2vOLK5NoRn2fVg_JS03NkY3KSy2nebWhfv7AY9e.gWJ28qK2900jDitQefO1eierqMj0yNwV7U5xCwGORyDp8yBVBF7oZLTr7GqI__3XsXO; HttpOnly; SameSite=None; Secure; Path=/; Domain=searchiq.co; Expires=Wed, 20 May 2026 22:56:58 GMT (check if it's your IP address or e.g. a cluster IP) Strict Transport Security not offered Public Key Pinning -- Server banner cloudflare Application banner -- Cookie(s) 1 issued: 1/1 secure, 1/1 HttpOnly Security headers Cache-Control: public, max-age=5270400 Reverse Proxy banner -- Testing vulnerabilities Secure Renegotiation (RFC 5746) supported (OK) Secure Client-Initiated Renegotiation not vulnerable (OK) CRIME, TLS (CVE-2012-4929) not vulnerable (OK) BREACH (CVE-2013-3587) potentially NOT ok, "br gzip" HTTP compression detected. - only supplied "/" tested Can be ignored for static pages or if no secrets in the page POODLE, SSL (CVE-2014-3566) not vulnerable (OK) TLS_FALLBACK_SCSV (RFC 7507) Downgrade attack prevention supported (OK) SWEET32 (CVE-2016-2183, CVE-2016-6329) VULNERABLE, uses 64 bit block ciphers FREAK (CVE-2015-0204) not vulnerable (OK) DROWN (CVE-2016-0800, CVE-2016-0703) not vulnerable on this host and port (OK) make sure you don't use this certificate elsewhere with SSLv2 enabled services, see https://search.censys.io/search?resource=hosts&virtual_hosts=INCLUDE&q=EB64B0F7BEB363D59B05C466FE5F4D6D89F5EDB88FA35353C4FF1DD716FA7DAD LOGJAM (CVE-2015-4000), experimental not vulnerable (OK): no DH EXPORT ciphers, no DH key detected with <= TLS 1.2 BEAST (CVE-2011-3389) TLS1: ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA AES128-SHA ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA AES256-SHA DES-CBC3-SHA VULNERABLE -- but also supports higher protocols TLSv1.1 TLSv1.2 (likely mitigated) LUCKY13 (CVE-2013-0169), experimental potentially VULNERABLE, uses obsolete cipher block chaining ciphers with TLS, see server prefs. Winshock (CVE-2014-6321), experimental not vulnerable (OK) RC4 (CVE-2013-2566, CVE-2015-2808) no RC4 ciphers detected (OK) Done 2026-05-20 22:27:23 [ 122s] -->> 172.67.161.38:443 (api.searchiq.co) <<-- ----------------------------------------------------- Done testing now all IP addresses (on port 443): 104.21.89.150 172.67.161.38
About this Scan
This scan uses testssl.sh to check for:
- Protocols: SSLv2, SSLv3, TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, TLS 1.2, TLS 1.3
- Vulnerabilities: Heartbleed, POODLE, FREAK, Logjam, DROWN, etc.
- Cipher Suites: Weak ciphers, perfect forward secrecy (PFS) support.